Fraud Allegations Against Milei Dismissed by Argentine Judge in LIBRA Coin Case

A federal judge in Argentina has dismissed the fraud investigation tied to President Javier Milei’s promotion of the LIBRA token.

A federal judge in Argentina has cleared President Javier Milei of fraud allegations linked to the LIBRA meme coin scandal, according to reports from CoinGape and Coinfomania. The ruling effectively ends the judicial investigation into the president’s role in promoting the token.

The LIBRA controversy began earlier in Milei’s term, when he publicly endorsed the cryptocurrency on social media. The token’s price surged briefly after his endorsement before collapsing, leaving many retail investors with steep losses. Critics accused the project of resembling a rug pull, a scheme where developers or promoters abandon a token after inflating its value.

The episode triggered significant political backlash in Argentina. Opposition lawmakers called for investigations into Milei’s conduct, and some pushed for impeachment proceedings. Legal complaints followed, alleging that the president’s promotion of LIBRA may have constituted fraud or misled investors who bought the token based on his endorsement.

The judge’s decision to clear Milei removes a legal threat that had shadowed his administration for months. It also closes, at least for now, one of the most prominent instances of a sitting head of state facing judicial scrutiny over a cryptocurrency promotion. Milei has positioned himself internationally as a libertarian-leaning, market-friendly leader, and the LIBRA episode had complicated that image.

The LIBRA case drew comparisons to other meme coin controversies where public figures or celebrities promoted tokens that later lost most of their value. Such episodes have fueled broader debates about disclosure requirements and accountability for public endorsements of speculative digital assets. Regulators in several jurisdictions have scrutinized celebrity-backed token promotions in recent years, though enforcement approaches vary widely.

Details about the judge’s specific legal reasoning were not fully outlined in the available reporting. It remains unclear whether the ruling addresses civil claims from investors separately from the criminal fraud allegations that were reportedly dismissed. Argentine legal proceedings tied to the scandal may continue to evolve, even as the fraud case against Milei himself appears to have concluded.

The outcome is likely to be closely watched both domestically and internationally. Milei’s government has pursued a broadly deregulatory stance toward digital assets, and the LIBRA case had become a test of how that stance intersects with investor protection concerns.

Market Impact

The ruling is unlikely to move broader cryptocurrency markets directly, given the LIBRA token’s limited scale compared to major digital assets. Its significance lies more in political and regulatory signaling than in market mechanics.

For Argentina specifically, the decision may reduce near-term political uncertainty surrounding Milei’s crypto-friendly policy agenda. It could also influence how other public officials approach endorsements of speculative tokens, particularly in markets where regulatory frameworks for meme coins remain underdeveloped.

With the fraud investigation now dismissed, attention shifts to whether any separate investor claims tied to the LIBRA collapse will proceed through Argentina’s courts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the LIBRA meme coin scandal?

It centered on President Javier Milei’s social media endorsement of the LIBRA token, which surged in price and then crashed, causing losses for investors.

What did the Argentine judge decide?

According to CoinGape and Coinfomania, the judge dismissed the fraud case against Milei and dropped the related investigation.

Does this ruling resolve all legal issues from the LIBRA collapse?

The reporting does not clarify whether separate investor claims or other legal actions related to LIBRA remain active.

Why did Milei’s endorsement draw scrutiny?

Critics argued his promotion of the token resembled schemes where values are inflated before collapsing, prompting fraud allegations and calls for impeachment.

Original source: AltcoinGordon

Syndicated coverage. Originally reported by altcoingordon.com.