U.Today and crypto.news both cover Michael Saylor’s ‘digital energy’ framing of Bitcoin and Strategy’s holdings, but disagree on whether the company’s Digital Credit instruments like STRC are blockchain-based tokenized obligations or conventional securities.
U.Today and crypto.news both cover Michael Saylor’s ‘digital energy’ framing of Bitcoin and Strategy’s holdings, but disagree on whether the company’s Digital Credit instruments like STRC are blockchain-based tokenized obligations or conventional securities.
Strategy channels Bitcoin’s digital energy into a collateral base, issuing tokenized obligations with fixed yields against it.
Strategy’s preferred shares are conventional securities, not blockchain tokens collateralized directly by specific Bitcoin holdings.
What would settle it: Strategy’s SEC filings and prospectus documents describing the legal structure of STRC, STRF, STRK, and STRD instruments.
When the flagship STRC token fell below par over the summer, management did not liquidate the Bitcoin collateral.
These instruments are not tokens issued on a blockchain.
What would settle it: Strategy’s SEC filings and prospectus documents describing the legal structure of STRC, STRF, STRK, and STRD instruments.
Treat Saylor’s ‘digital energy’ quote and the 840,447 BTC holding figure as established; do not treat the classification of STRC and related Digital Credit instruments as tokenized blockchain obligations as settled until checked against Strategy’s SEC filings and prospectus language.
Treat Saylor’s ‘digital energy’ quote and the 840,447 BTC holding figure as established; do not treat the classification of STRC and related Digital Credit instruments as tokenized blockchain obligations as settled until checked against Strategy’s SEC filings and prospectus language.
Original source: AltcoinGordon
Syndicated coverage. Originally reported by altcoingordon.com.