SEC Charges Bank of America Banker and Ex-Wall Street Colleague Over Insider Trading Scheme
Regulators allege the pair traded ahead of an $8.1 billion deal, generating profits reported as high as $18.5 million.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed insider trading charges against a banker employed by Bank of America. A second individual, described as a former Wall Street banker, faces related charges in the same case. Regulators allege the pair used non-public information tied to a pending $8.1 billion transaction to place profitable trades ahead of its announcement.
Accounts of the case differ on the scale of the alleged scheme. One report puts the deal value at $8.1 billion, while another describes the scheme’s total illicit profits at $18.5 million. Both figures point to the same underlying allegation: that confidential deal information was misused for personal financial gain before the transaction became public.
Insider trading cases involving investment bankers typically hinge on access to material, non-public information generated during deal advisory work. Bankers involved in mergers, acquisitions, or large financing transactions often have early visibility into terms, timing, and pricing. The SEC has long treated the misuse of that access as a serious breach of securities law, given the direct threat it poses to market fairness.
The agency’s enforcement division typically builds these cases using trading pattern analysis, communications records, and timing correlations between trades and material corporate announcements. Cases of this type often result in parallel criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, depending on the severity of the alleged conduct and the amounts involved.
Bank of America has not been named as a defendant in the case, according to the available reporting. The charges appear to target the individual banker and the second former Wall Street professional, rather than the institution itself. This distinction matters for how the case may unfold, since firm-level liability and individual liability carry different legal and reputational consequences.
The SEC has not yet detailed the full scope of the alleged trading activity, including how the information was allegedly obtained or transmitted between the two individuals. Additional details are expected to emerge as the case proceeds through the regulatory and possibly judicial process. Bank of America has not issued a public statement addressed in the current reporting.
Sources disagree on this story
This article was published before the reports below were compared. The reporting above stands; what follows is where the published accounts do not agree.
CoinTurk News EN identifies the accused bankers by different first names than Cryptopolitan and CryptoBriefing in reporting on the same SEC insider-trading case tied to the South Jersey Industries acquisition.
What all sources agree on
- The SEC charged two former Wall Street/Bank of America investment bankers over insider trading tied to South Jersey Industries’ 2022 acquisition.
- The deal was valued at $8.1 billion, with Infrastructure Investments Fund taking South Jersey private at $36 a share.
- South Jersey Industries’ stock surged roughly 40% when the deal was announced.
- One of the accused bankers, Satsky, was a lead/senior banker on the deal and was terminated by Bank of America in March 2025.
- The other accused individual, Wolfe, is alleged to have purchased about 2.2 million shares and profited roughly $18.5 million.
- Wolfe traded through entities including Evergreen Capital and GAW Holdings.
- Both Satsky and Wolfe left Credit Suisse for Bank of America in 2012.
- Satsky’s lawyer Robert Anello and Wolfe’s lawyer Reed Brodsky have denied the allegations on their clients’ behalf.
- The charges allege violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.
Where the reports disagree
1First name of the accused banker Satsky
The SEC says Jason Satsky tipped Gavin Wolfe, who bought more than 2.2 million shares and made about $18.5 million when the stock jumped on the deal news.
According to the SEC, Mark Satsky, 59, served as a senior banker specializing in energy and utilities at a prominent New York bank and played a lead role in South Jersey Industries’ business.
What would settle it: The SEC’s complaint (case 1:26-cv-07132, Southern District of New York)
2First name of the accused trader Wolfe
Mr. Wolfe, his 55-year-old friend and former colleague, was alleged to have traded about 2.2 million shares, making a profit of $18.5 million when the stock rose about 40% on the news.
The agency claims Satsky communicated with David Wolfe, 55, a friend and former colleague, in the period leading up to a takeover of South Jersey Industries.
What would settle it: The SEC’s complaint (case 1:26-cv-07132, Southern District of New York)
3Start date of the U.S. Attorney’s office investigation
The U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan has been investigating the very same transaction for at least since the spring of last year, and still there have been no criminal charges filed.
Manhattan’s U.S. Attorney’s office has been examining the same transaction since at least spring 2024.
What would settle it: A statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York confirming when the investigation began
What to make of it
Treat the deal terms, stock surge, and Bank of America’s termination of Satsky as established across all three reports; the accused individuals’ first names and the exact start date of the criminal investigation differ between outlets and are not yet settled by a public document quoted here.
Market Impact
Insider trading enforcement actions involving major bank employees tend to draw scrutiny toward compliance and information-barrier practices across investment banking divisions. Firms often respond to such cases by reviewing internal controls around deal-related communications and trading surveillance systems, even when the institution itself is not charged.
For markets broadly, the case underscores ongoing regulatory attention to trading activity surrounding large corporate transactions. It does not, based on current reporting, indicate systemic issues at Bank of America or broader instability in deal markets. The financial impact is likely to be concentrated on the individuals charged rather than the bank’s operations or stock performance.
The SEC’s charges add to a steady pattern of enforcement actions targeting individual misuse of confidential deal information. Further clarity on the scheme’s scale and outcome is expected as the case progresses.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the SEC alleging in this case?
The SEC alleges a Bank of America banker and a former Wall Street colleague traded on non-public information ahead of a large corporate deal, generating illicit profits.
Why do the reported figures differ?
One source cites an $8.1 billion deal value tied to the alleged scheme, while another reports $18.5 million in profits from the trading activity. Both details relate to the same case but describe different aspects of it.
Is Bank of America itself being charged?
Based on current reporting, the charges target the individual banker and a second former Wall Street professional, not Bank of America as an institution.
What happens next in an SEC insider trading case like this?
Such cases typically proceed through SEC administrative or civil litigation processes and may involve parallel criminal charges from the Department of Justice, depending on the findings.
Original source: AltcoinGordon
Syndicated coverage. Originally reported by altcoingordon.com.
Read More
